Welcome to By 2100!


This Blog is designed to be a Diary of Events illustrating Global Climate Change, and where it will lead.

Commentary is encouraged, but this Blog is not intended for discussion on the Validity of Climate Change.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Climate Deniers Don't Follow Their Own Rules - Hilarious!

From Real Climate:

The Institute of Physics (IoP) recently made a splash in the media through a statement about the implications of the e-mails stolen in the CRU hack. A couple of articles in the Guardian report how this statement was submitted to an inquiry into the CRU hack and provide some background.

The statement calls for increased transparency, and expresses concerns about the public confidence in science if the transparency is absent. The IoP statement, however, fails to note that the issue of transparency is far more generally applicable than just to mainstream climate science. It should also involve the critics of climate change, as noted by New Scientist.


Another question arises is whether the IoP follows its own recommendations in its own publications?

The statement of the IoP was made on the behalf of its 36000 members, but as a member of IoP myself, this came as a surprise. According to the Guardian, there was only a small group of people behind this, and other IoP members were obviously not very impressed. The IoP did, however, make a second statement after their initial one was misrepresented by the climate-change deniers (there is some confusion about versions).

The irony of this affair is that the IoP will not disclose who were responsible for the original statement, thus not living up to the standards they set for others.

Furthermore, it’s a paradox that the IoP based the statement on stolen private e-mail exchanges, while putting disclaimers about confidentiality, especially as it asks people to delete any e-mail before they go astray:

"This email (and attachments) are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender, delete any copies and do not take action in reliance on it…"

As The Guardian points out, there's good reason why the IoP didn't want the whole mess released - the statement requesting transparency AND the questions given to the BBC to try to trap Phil Jones came not from the IoP's members, but from a front group for the Oil Companies...
 
The Guardian's Article
 
Just too Funny...
.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment

www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.